by date

* Comment by h on 20 Nov 2008 - 19:12:39 CET
only old stuff here! close this shitty side!

* Comment by paddy on 20 Nov 2008 - 11:18:59 CET
best porn website ever! - congrats guys!

* Comment by admin on 19 Nov 2008 - 23:13:43 CET
phew... anyone in here remembering the name of that amateur series zxcv ist talking about or has a filename within this set? i´d really have to dig deep to find this. if i stumble over it i´ll let you know.

* Comment by zxcv on 18 Nov 2008 - 11:51:46 CET
The gallery from 14.12.07 has no link, please fix! :) I'd love to see it, rated 7.6 and delicious sample pics.

* Comment by admin on 15 Nov 2008 - 20:20:53 CET
we´re changing our hardware within the next days so we have to pause the uploads for a few days. a message in the blog follows...

* Comment by dickhead on 14 Nov 2008 - 13:53:45 CET
no country for old men.

* Comment by admin on 12 Nov 2008 - 16:19:47 CET
the primary sorting should stay 'by date'. an order by voting makes only sence as an add- on in the drop down menu - i guess it was meant this way. seeing titties and drop wood isn´t the only thing that confuses me in here. it seems like 60% of the visitors just download and wank to the preview pics... thats just wtf!

* Comment by NRG on 12 Nov 2008 - 8:02:30 CET
Patricia Petite is the name of the girl (pornstar) from 280

* Comment by jesus christ on 12 Nov 2008 - 7:00:59 CET
No. Arranging by rating is foolish. Its hard enough to keep track of where I left off downloading. By date is the best way. Besides, have you seen these guys ratings? They see titty and pop wood. Lets keep it the way it is.

* Comment by admin on 12 Nov 2008 - 1:27:48 CET
thanks for the hint, anyway we should keep... or not? :-)